5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
Blog Article
refers into a landmark case decided because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Here’s a brief overview:
Online access to civil and criminal cases in decide on circuit courts. Cases may very well be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal has not challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're with the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion could be regarded as, however, we're very clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy topic for the approval with the competent authority.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Reasonable grounds are offered to the record to connect the petitioner with the commission of the alleged offence. While punishment in the alleged offence does not tumble while in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. nevertheless discovered Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising out of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is from the credit from the petitioner as accused, therefore, case with the petitioner falls in the exception where bail cannot be granted even during the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, assistance has long been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of your same is hereby reproduced:
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment with the grid project and submitted that ample mitigation measures were in place to render any probable adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted for being designed.
The issue here is that an accused may possibly say that they meant to injure the victim, but they didn't intend to destroy them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted due to accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor supposed.
Online access towards the case management system with the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases can be searched using name or case number.
This case has uk case law search engine become cited in numerous subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional regulation, judicial independence, as well as rule of legislation.
Generally speaking, higher courts usually do not have direct oversight over the lessen courts of record, in that they cannot reach out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments with the reduced courts.
When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only done In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were very well aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
competent authority has determined the eligibility from the private respondents and found them for being in good shape for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)